MCP design choices
Token economics, wide schemas, and cell budgets behind Axiom's MCP server.
PLATFORM / MCP
Wire your AI agents to the same data your engineers query, with the same languages. Axiom's MCP server is designed around how agents actually use machine data: wide schemas, sensible cell budgets, and full access scope.
THE MOAT
Every vendor ships an MCP server. The difference is how it's built — for the way agents actually consume machine data.
Token economics, wide schemas, and cell budgets behind Axiom's MCP server.
High-cardinality metrics, fully queryable by AI agents through MCP and the metrics skill.
Patterns that move agents from hypothesis to proof.
No Standard Indexing SKU — every byte you load is queryable by your agents through the same primitives.
ARCHITECTURE / MCP SERVER
Datadog and ClickHouse already ship MCP servers; Splunk will. MCP existence is no longer a moat. The lasting differentiators are design quality (how the server formats results so agents don't burn tokens on real-world data), access scope (what data is reachable through the server), and managed delivery (whether the customer is running the cluster the agent queries).
TECHNICAL DEEP DIVES
Six surfaces an agent-builder reaches for — each one a real APL or MPL primitive, not a per-vendor adapter.
Exposes APL (logs, events, traces) and MPL (metrics) to AI agents. Schema introspection, query execution, and result shaping designed for agent token budgets.
Patterns that move agents from hypothesis to proof during an incident: scope the symptom, find the surrounding signals, narrow the window, propose a root cause, verify against the data.
No Standard Indexing SKU. Every byte loaded is reachable by the agent through the same primitives engineers use.
Agent queries count toward query-hour usage. No separate rate limits, no second pricing dial. Pricing is the same usage-based model as APL.
“Axiom’s MCP won me round. During a pentest, Claude Code used it to investigate the logs and traces around our Sentry errors, then built a dashboard showing the requests, endpoints, and error codes the pentester was triggering.”
— Ed, Clove
FAQ
DESIGN AND DIFFERENTIATION
Every major vendor has or will ship an MCP server. The differentiators are design quality (result shaping, cell budgets, schema introspection), access scope (no Standard Indexing SKU gating what agents see), and managed delivery (no cluster you operate for the agent to query).
The MCP server's result shaping is designed around agent token economics: cell budgets cap runaway responses, schema introspection exposes only what the agent needs to plan, and pagination is automatic for large result sets.
SKILLS
Patterns that move agents from hypothesis to proof: scope the symptom, find the surrounding signals, narrow the time window, propose a root cause, verify against the data. Used by SRE agents to lower MTTR during incidents.
Patterns for querying MetricsDB in MPL: aggregations, time-series, high-cardinality tag filtering, and comparison across time windows.
Skills are evolving as the MCP ecosystem matures. Today the SRE and metrics skills ship with the server. Additional skills (and a skill SDK) are on the roadmap.
INTEGRATION AND USAGE
No. Agent queries count toward query-hour usage the same way human queries do. The same in-app spending limits apply.
Yes. MCP is the open protocol; any MCP-compatible client (Claude, Cursor, custom agents built on the MCP SDK) connects.
No. Agents use the same query languages engineers use. The SRE and metrics skills teach the agent to compose queries that fit the question.
Petabyte-scale ingest. Pricing you can predict.SRE and metrics skills included.